Recent Posts

1

OBDLink MX+ / Re: Compatibility and Features Inquiry for OBDLink MX+ with Renault Captur II 2020

« Last post by Dom94 on December 27, 2025, 02:00:07 am »

Thank you so much for your accurate response. I imagined it was like that with the OBDLINK app. The first and third solution you gave me don't work, they're fake. While iCarsoft and RenoCOM I had never seen them, thank you.

Actually in these days I have tried to use pyren with python and the most updated database clip 198 I think. The car goes out and I managed to do a total scan of all the control units and delete the errors. However, I was looking for a faster solution through the app.

2

OBDLink MX+ / Re: Compatibility and Features Inquiry for OBDLink MX+ with Renault Captur II 2020

« Last post by Ecmbuster on December 26, 2025, 10:45:29 pm »

2020 Renault Captur II

Renault manufactuer PIDS are not built into the application. (Enhanced OEM Add-Ons)
The application however, will access OBD II and or EOBD.
The information provided is limited to the Engine Controller but can access fault codes with other controllers related to communications via Engine Controller "only if available".

These are examples of Renault style scan tools in relation to your questions:

https://www.klavkarr.com/compatible/renault-capturii-49000227

https://www.obdtester.com/rencom

https://www.myautoaid.com/diagnostic-tools/renault/

https://www.icarsoft.eu/Renault-Diagnostic-Tools

The Renault Clip however is the factory scan tool with many clones in existence.

The next piece of advice is a factory serviced manual.

3

OBDLink MX+ / Compatibility and Features Inquiry for OBDLink MX+ with Renault Captur II 2020

« Last post by Dom94 on December 25, 2025, 10:38:35 am »

Hi OBDLink Team,

I hope you’re doing well. I am interested in purchasing the OBDLink MX+ and I would like to clarify a few compatibility and functionality questions before I proceed.

I own a Renault Captur II (2020) with the 1.5 dCi 115 CV diesel engine. I also use an iPhone 16 Pro Max with iOS 26.2.

Could you please confirm the following:
   1.   Full compatibility
   •   Is the OBDLink MX+ fully compatible with my vehicle model and engine using the OBDLink app on iOS?
   •   Can it reliably read and clear fault codes from ALL central modules (e.g., engine, transmission, ABS, airbag, body control)?
   2.   Advanced data availability
   •   Does the OBDLink MX+ support advanced parameter readings such as:
   •   DPF data (soot load, regeneration status, etc.)
   •   Glow plug (candelette) status
   •   Injector data / corrections / individual cylinder performance
   3.   Transmission-specific codes
   •   Can it read/clear codes and generate accurate data for automatic transmissions (e.g., EDC / DCT) without false or spurious CAN bus errors?
   4.   CAN bus stability
   •   Are there mechanisms in the MX+ and app to avoid false error codes or unstable CAN bus readings, especially on vehicles with complex bus architectures like Renault?
   5.   iPhone/iOS performance
   •   Do you have any specific recommendations or known issues with iPhone 16 Pro Max running iOS 26.2 and the OBDLink app?

I bought Renault Captur II in Italy.

Thank you very much for your assistance. I appreciate your help in ensuring I select the best diagnostic tool for my needs.

4

OBDLink / Re: Cannot get a state response for the parameter

« Last post by Shawnf350 on December 09, 2025, 04:15:09 am »

I passed this on to STN Staff but I suggest you  also put in a support ticket.

https://support.scantool.net/support/tickets/new

Kind regards,
Shawn

5

OBDLink / Re: Cannot get a state response for the parameter

« Last post by felekes on December 08, 2025, 03:40:01 am »

Hi,
I have got exatly the same problem.
I just purchased the OBDLINK MX+ few weeks ago and installed the android app.
I marked 42 PIDs to monitor. Some SAE PIDS some Ford specific. (I also have a MK3 Focus RS, mine year 2016)
I also get exactly the same error message when try to convert the data logs to csv : "Error: Cannot get a state response for the parameter"

6

OBDLink CX / Re: CX BLE API?

« Last post by STN-Brian on December 05, 2025, 03:24:15 pm »

To change the header use the ATSH command:
ATSH 6F1

7

OBDLink EX / Re: DTC modules not showing codes

« Last post by Joe Repic on December 04, 2025, 10:45:35 am »

I was suprised that there are no some kind of codes in relation to "Lpw Tier Pressure" I just top it up and drove the truck for few kilometers and fault resets its self.

Regards
Joe

8

OBDLink CX / Re: CX BLE API?

« Last post by kuhlejai on December 03, 2025, 10:26:36 pm »

Edit: I got it working for standard OBD-II PID requests. The issue was the Bluetooth library I was using in Arduino.

What I can't currently figure out is how to change the header ID (or default functional CAN ID) for service requests from 0x7DF to the one required for BMW enhanced PID requests on 0x6F1. Is this possible? Does the OBDLink CX support ISO 15765-2 (ISO-TP) extended addressing for manufacturer-specific (0x22) service requests?

Basically my app currently datalogs PT-CAN Bus channels that I know of and GPS from my Race Box Mini. I am hopping to add in OBD Enhanced PID's, I am coding in Arduino (C++). When I try sending the 0x22 service requests I get no response, I think i need to use 0x6F1 CAN ID specifically.

9

OBDLink CX / Re: CX BLE API?

« Last post by STN-Brian on December 02, 2025, 01:00:06 pm »

Can you tell us a little more about your project?
What language are you using?
Are you getting any error messages?
Did you implement a custom UART driver based on the example provided?

10

OBDLink EX / Re: DTC modules not showing codes

« Last post by Shawnf350 on November 30, 2025, 07:15:21 pm »

If all of the tire pressures are showing,  there shouldn't be any codes.
Are you seeing all four tire pressures,  or is one missing when you see the diagram of the vehicle?

I can load up my Forscan tomorrow on my Ford truck and see what I can view Monday.
Or I'll ask my son. He's a tech at a Ford dealership.
If you like,  PM me after this.


Regards,
Shawn